The Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted special review from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to address the issue of whether the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (CASPA), 73 P.S. §§ 501-506, applies to federal government projects located in Pennsylvania. The decision is important because CASPA enables contractors and subcontractors to recover unpaid payments under construction contracts, as well as interest, penalties and attorneys’ fees. The key legal issue is whether the term “other association” referenced in the definition section of the statute refers to the federal government.
There is currently conflicting precedent on the issue. Two Pennsylvania Courts of Common Pleas have held that CASPA does not apply to projects where the owner is a governmental entity. See Hoffmeister v. Skepton Constr.
, Inc., 55 Northampton 48 (Northampton Cnty. C.C.P. Mar. 21, 2006); Mastercraft Woodworking Co. v. Jim Lagana Plumbing & Heating Inc.
, 9 Pa. D. & C. 5th 251 (Berks Cnty. C.C.P. July 27, 2009). However, two district courts in the Third Circuit came to the opposite conclusion on this issue, holding that CASPA does apply to such projects. See Scandale Associated Builders & Eng’rs, Ltd. v. Bell Justice Facilities Corp.
, 455 F. Supp. 2d 271 (M.D. Pa. 2006); United States ex rel. ESCO Elec. Supply Co. v. Aeroplate Corp.
, No. 12-4647, 2013 WL 4763843 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 5, 2013).
On April 7, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard oral argument on the issue. Stay tuned for the Court’s decision.
The posting of information on this website, or the receipt of information by viewers of this website, is not intended to – and does not – create an attorney-client relationship. This website is not intended to provide legal advice, and visitors to this website should refrain from acting on information posted here without seeking specific legal advice from individually qualified counsel.