Publications
Articles
Events
Receive Industry & News Updates
Search
 


 
Employment NewsFlash, July 2011
E-Mailing After Dark: Eight Steps Toward Managing
Risks Associated with Employee Remote Access
 

There was a day when only executives or management-level employees used company-provided cell phones, blackberries and other PDAs, allowing them to work remotely both during and after regular business hours. Those times have changed. 



Mobile devices now saturate the workplace. Advances in communication technology provide all levels of employees with the capability to work remotely after regular business hours – through company-issued cell phones, PDAs, auto-forwarding of work e-mails to personal mobile devices and remote computer access software. This seismic advance in technology, however, raises a host of employment issues for companies when dealing with employees who are entitled to overtime pay. Defining overtime “work,” tracking hours worked and properly calculating overtime pay certainly has become more challenging.

Employers may be unwittingly exposed to claims for overtime compensation caused by the 24-hour nature of the virtual workplace, despite diligently tracking hours worked during regular business hours. To address the risks of employee remote access, employers should consider taking the following steps.

Step One:

Determine whether business needs require remote access for all employees, a certain group of employees, or just high-level management employees who also qualify for an exemption from overtime laws. Narrow the group as much as possible and then tailor your policies and actions accordingly.

Step Two: If all employees do not require 24-hour remote access, consult with IT personnel about the available restrictions on the remote server or e-mail access. For example, all employees subject to overtime laws could be locked out of the remote server during non-business hours.
Step Three: Ask IT personnel about methods for tracking and archiving the time employees spend working remotely so that, should a claim for overtime compensation be made, records exist for use in any legal defense.
Step Four: A general “Computer Systems Policy” is no longer enough. Employers also should implement a “Remote Access Policy” based on their particular business needs. The policy should delineate expectations for remote access (e.g., that employees subject to overtime should not check e-mail outside of business hours without prior authorization or a business emergency), require employees to track and timely submit accurate time records for any remote work outside of business hours, address any required security measures, and incorporate anti-harassment and other acceptable use provisions of the employer’s general Computer Systems Policy.
Step Five: Avoid providing employees subject to overtime pay with employer-issued mobile devices. If the business requires otherwise, issue a clear written directive that such devices are for use during regular business hours only.
Step Six: Communicate with supervisors about whether assigned tasks may reasonably be completed during business hours. If off-hours work is needed, supervisors should reiterate to employees that any overtime work should be timely reported. Supervisors should also avoid, where feasible, e-mailing, telephoning, or otherwise issuing communications requiring an immediate response during non-business hours to any employee subject to overtime laws. If such communications are necessary, they should either contain a reminder that the employee should timely report the overtime worked or a disclaimer that no response is expected until the next business day.
Step Seven: Prohibit all employees from diverting their work e-mails to their personal mobile devices without obtaining prior approval by their supervisor and oversight by computer personnel. If diversion is allowed, confirm that appropriate mechanisms are in place for ensuring that the e-mails remain secure and may still be tracked and read by the employer if needed.
Step Eight: Review employee classifications periodically to determine whether certain employees are appropriately classified as exempt from overtime requirements under both federal and state law. Job titles and job descriptions alone are insufficient without a thorough analysis of the employee’s actual job duties.

Companies certainly face challenges when balancing customer demands with their overtime pay obligations. Clear written policies and effective employee communication, however, go a long way toward combating the legal risks created by the around-the-clock virtual workplace.


Stradley Ronon's
Employment & Labor Practice Group counsels businesses on how to prevent employment-related problems before they arise. At the first sign of a problem, our clients receive practical, step-by-step advice on how to manage the situation. If a dispute erupts, our lawyers render advice at every stage — investigation, negotiation and, if necessary, litigation.

Employment & Labor Practice Group
 

William E. Mahoney Jr.
Francis X. Manning
Mark J. McCullough
John J. Murphy III
Michael D. O'Mara
James F. Podheiser
Thomas J. Renehan Jr.
Ellen Rosen Rogoff
A. Nicole Stover


The posting of information on this Web site, or the receipt of information by viewers of this Web site, is not intended to — and does not — create an attorney-client relationship. This Web site is not intended to provide legal advice, and visitors to this Web site should refrain from acting on information posted here without seeking specific legal advice from individually qualified counsel.

 

VIEW PDF
Employment NewsFlash,July 2011
E-Mailing After Dark: Eight Steps Toward Managing Risks Associated with Employee Remote Access
RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Employment NewsFlash, June 2011
Hot Off the Press: EEOC Addresses Extended Leaves
Employment NewsFlash, May 2011
Flip-flop Fridays and Other Hot Summer Employment Topics
Employment NewsFlash, April 2011
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? Yes No
Employment NewsFlash, March 2011
Out of the Shadows: Employment Law Violations
Now Online
Employment NewsFlash, February 2011
The Graying Workforce: Risks and Rewards
of Older Workers
Employment NewsFlash, January 2011
STAY OUT OF MY GENES! New Risks for Employers
Exposed to Employee Family Medical History
Employment NewsFlash, December 2010
DOL Issues Preliminary Interpretation of Required Break Time for Nursing Mothers
Employment NewsFlash, November 2010
New Massachusetts Law Prohibits Criminal History Requests on Applications
Employment NewsFlash, October 2010
Employers' Obligations under the New ADA:
Responding to Employee Requests for Accommodations
Employment NewsFlash, September 2010
Interview Do’s and Don’ts: What Employers Need to Know
Employment NewsFlash, August 2010:
Threats of Violence in the Workplace: How Employers Should Manage and Respond
Employment NewsFlash, July 2010:
Love Among the Cubicles
Employment NewsFlash, June 2010:
The Lighter Side of the Workplace
Employment NewsFlash, May 2010:
Avoiding Traps in Hiring Summer Interns
Employment NewsFlash, April 2010:
Healthcare Reform: What Employers Need to Know Now
Employment NewsFlash, March 2010:
IRS Announces New Audits of Employment Practices
Employment NewsFlash, February 2010:
FMLA Amended Again for 2010
Employment NewsFlash, January 2010:
Employer Goals: A 10-Point Checklist for 2010
Home | About the Firm | Attorneys | Practice Areas | Recognition | Careers | News | Resources | Sitemap
Copyright © 2013 Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.