Dean V. Krishna
PartnerChair, Tax
Business Vantage Point Blog
Go to Business Vantage Point BlogProposed Treasury and IRS Regulations for Trump Accounts: What You Need to Know
May 19, 2026As part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the sweeping tax and domestic policy bill signed into law last July, the Trump Accounts were established under the Working Families Tax Cuts legislation to create new tax-advantaged savings accounts for children. The accounts can be funded starting July 4, 2026. The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS have issued proposed regulations that provide guidance on general requirements and elections. The proposed regulations are expected to affect 73 million children in 44 million families. Initial Guidance Regarding Trump Accounts Trump Accounts are governed by Sections 530A and 6434 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Trump Accounts are generally treated similarly to individual retirement accounts (IRAs), which are governed by IRC Section 408A, for federal income tax purposes. Trump Account beneficiaries must be under 18 years of age, possess a Social Security number, and elect (either directly or through an authorized individual) to create a Trump Account. Through the Trump Account Contribution Pilot Program, children born after December 31, 2024, and before January 1, 2029, will be credited $1,000 upon establishing their Trump Accounts. Contributions to Trump Accounts are limited to a maximum of $5,000 per calendar year (which figure will be subject to cost-of-living adjustments for tax years after 2027), though the following contributions are exempt from the $5,000 cap: Qualified rollover contributions (e.g., transferring funds from one Trump Account to a new Trump Account opened with a different custodian for the same beneficiary). Qualified general contributions (e.g., payments from nonprofit organizations or state or local governments to the Treasury Department on behalf of a qualified class). Contributions made under IRC Section 6434 (e.g., the aforementioned $1,000 seeding for eligible beneficiaries). No distributions are allowed prior to the beneficiary reaching 18 years of age (what is known as the “growth period"). Distributions after age 18 are treated similarly to early IRA withdrawals and may be subject to a 10% penalty if made before the beneficiary reaches 59-and-a-half years of age, unless the distribution is for a qualified use (e.g., higher education expenses and health insurance premiums during a period of unemployment). Trump Accounts may only invest in mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track a “qualified index” (e.g., the S&P 500), do not use leverage, and do not have annual fees and expenses of more than 0.1% of the balance of the investment in the fund. Eligible investments do not include any industry or sector-specific index but may include an index based on market capitalization. Proposed Regulations Cover Trump Account Requirements, Elections On March 6, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Proposed Section 1.530A–1, the main points of which are summarized below: General Requirements Trump Accounts would be considered a type of traditional IRA and, as such, be governed by a written instrument meeting the requirements of IRC Sections 408(a)(1) through (6). Trump Accounts could not be a SIMPLE IRA (Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees) under IRC Section 408(p) and could not accept contributions from an employer’s simplified employee pension (SEP) arrangement under IRC Section 408(k). Trump Accounts must be titled as such, and a beneficiary will be treated as attaining an additional year of age as of their birthday for purposes of IRC Section 530A. Electing to Open a Trump Account Individuals authorized to open a Trump Account would include, in order of priority, a legal guardian, parent, adult sibling or grandparent of the eligible individual. Comments are requested on whether definitions are needed for “legal guardian,” “parent,” “sibling” and “grandparent.” Such authorized individual would represent, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is authorized to open the initial Trump Account for the eligible individual and that there is no other person with a higher priority available to make the election. Elections would be made via a form prescribed by the secretary of the Treasury (i.e., Form 4547) or through an electronic application or website made available by the secretary. The responsible party of the Trump Account would be the individual who makes the election to open such account. What’s Next? The proposed regulations reserve several items for further comment, including employer contributions to Trump Accounts and the proposed applicability date. Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must have been received by May 8, 2026. Stradley Ronon is monitoring for further developments from the Treasury and government.QSBS Exits: Key Planning Considerations and Pitfalls to Avoid
March 24, 2025“Look on every exit as being an entrance somewhere else.” – Sir Tom Stoppard, playwright and screenwriter Particularly since tax rates for C corporations were decreased to 21% starting in 2018, we have seen startups begin their life as C corporations for federal income tax purposes rather than waiting to convert upon future growth. In addition to positioning the startup for an eventual venture capital funding round, C corporation status also starts the five-year holding period for the QSBS (qualified small business stock) tax break. In a prior post, we discussed some of the basics of the QSBS tax break. This post focuses on some considerations as a QSBS investment matures and a liquidity event is in sight. Moving Toward an Exit: Considerations Rollover Under Section 1045. In general, Section 1045 of the Internal Revenue Code allows some or all of the amounts received that are subject to capital gain in a QSBS investment to be invested into a second QSBS investment, thus preserving QSBS benefits via a second investment. Importantly, Section 1045 allows QSBS investments that have not been held for five years (but have been held for at least six months) to maintain their QSBS status through a rollover investment; i.e., if there is an exit event before five years, the QSBS holder can still potentially take advantage of the QSBS tax break, although via a second QSBS investment. Among other limitations, a key practical limitation to utilization of Section 1045 rollovers is that the second QSBS investment needs to be acquired within 60 days of the sale of the first QSBS investment. Oftentimes owners, particularly those busy with closing and post-closing transition issues, don’t have the time or information at hand to line up a second QSBS investment that is worthy of receiving the owners’ hard-earned deal proceeds. Just as with the original QSBS investment, the second “rollover” QSBS investment should be vetted for QSBS qualification. Ideally the second company (the one issuing “rollover” shares) would provide representations on QSBS status, covenants to report consistently therewith and provide necessary documentation, and an indemnification if representations or covenants are breached. We have fielded questions about whether a “rollover” QSBS investment meets the active business requirement for QSBS treatment. Starting in 2024, the IRS stated it will no longer issue private letter rulings on the active business requirement (see Revenue Procedures 2024-3 and 2025-3), indicating the question could be under study by the IRS, with possible guidance forthcoming. We are continuing to monitor for developments. Planning for the five-year holding period. Sometimes sellers who have owned stock for less than five years have a buyer willing to enter into an agreement to acquire the QSBS stock for legal purposes after the five-year holding period has been met. It is certainly possible to agree to a sale before the five-year holding period is met and close on the sale after that holding period is met, but meaningful planning would be needed to avoid having the sale treated as a constructive sale for tax purposes on an earlier date (thus depriving QSBS benefits). SAFEs. While not a focus of this post, there is substantial uncertainty whether a simple agreement for future equity (SAFE), even if the SAFE has language stating equity ownership is intended upon issuance of the SAFE, is equity for QSBS treatment. Gifting pre-sale. The closer to an exit, the less value there would generally be in gifting QSBS stock. However, “stacking” gifts could still be beneficial. (View this article for more.) QSBS attestation letter. Obtaining a QSBS attestation letter from the company that issued QSBS shares helps strengthen the case for the QSBS tax break upon an examination by a taxing authority. Obtaining a letter is a reasonable ask as part of any consent to a sale. Please note that while we view the request as reasonable given that the company has all the requisite information, some companies refuse to issue such a letter. Lack of state conformity. Not all states conform with federal law on QSBS, thus causing state income taxes to be occasionally due when no federal income tax is due. This can surprise unprepared taxpayers. Election on income tax return. Both the QSBS exclusion and the rollover under Section 1045 need to be affirmatively opted into on tax returns. Multiple blocks. The sale documents should specify which blocks of stock are sold — particularly if some blocks qualify for QSBS treatment and others do not. (For example, if those blocks were purchased within five years of the sale or were purchased when the company was no longer a qualified small business under IRC Section 1202.) Finishing the Exercise The QSBS tax break can be lucrative for founders and early investors and help attract investors during the early life of a startup. As the life cycle of the startup moves toward an exit (and a “somewhere else”), finishing the exercise and ensuring the tax break is able to be utilized is an important component of the exit.The Looming Tax ‘Armageddon’
February 2, 2024“Yeah, one more thing, um … none of them wanna pay taxes again. Ever.” — Harry Stamper (Bruce Willis), “Armageddon” (1998) With a flurry of changes to tax laws starting with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) and continuing through the early COVID-19 years, the pace and scope was dizzying to business owners and their tax and deal advisers. Now, after a quiet few years, a wave of new potential changes looms in the next 18 to 24 months. Major provisions of the TCJA are scheduled to sunset by their own terms at the end of 2025. The changes would be so comprehensive that some commentators are referring to 2025 as tax “Armageddon.” TCJA provisions of note for businesses and their owners that are scheduled to expire include: The deduction for pass-through business income (199A deduction). The reduction of marginal income tax rates (including the reduction of the top rate from 39.6 percent to 37 percent). The $10,000 cap on deductions from state and local taxes (SALT cap). The elimination of overall limitations on the amount of itemized deductions an individual may take (Pease limitations). Certain income deductions for domestic C corporations related to the TCJA’s new global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) regime (the deduction will be reduced from 50 percent to 37.5 percent starting in 2026) and foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) regime (the deduction will be reduced from 37.5 percent to 21.875 percent starting in 2026). The doubling of the estate tax exemption. The TCJA required research and development expenses beginning in 2022 to be amortized over time rather than immediately deducted. We are monitoring that provision, along with certain bonus depreciation provisions of the TCJA that are subjects of legislation currently pending in Congress. Other related items of note from the TCJA include: The TCJA’s new limitation on excess business losses is scheduled to sunset in 2028 and might be a part of a future tax package involving TCJA provisions. The TCJA’s imposition of a 21 percent corporate tax rate is not scheduled to sunset. Tax advantages with respect to qualified opportunity zones are scheduled to sunset for new investments made after 2026. In parallel, the Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of the Treasury are currently considering offering guidance to better define the contours of what constitutes a limited partner for self-employment tax purposes, particularly in light of the Soroban Capital Partners v. Commissioner decision from November 2023. In Soroban, the U.S. Tax Court ruled that limited partners in state law limited partnerships could be subject to self-employment taxes. It is yet to be seen whether any changes to the self-employment tax regime will be part of a tax package that will potentially extend the otherwise expiring TCJA provisions. The upcoming presidential and congressional elections this fall will significantly impact the extent to which any of the expiring TCJA provisions are extended and/or modified. We will be monitoring closely and are hopeful that watching the legislative process unfold will not be like watching a disaster movie. Stay tuned.‘Does QSBS Apply?’: An Introduction to Qualified Small Business Stock
May 30, 2023One question we consistently receive from both startups and venture capital investors is whether qualified small business stock (QSBS) applies to a structure. They may have previously experienced the benefits of QSBS first-hand or have seen headlines such as the New York Times’ “A Lavish Tax Dodge for the Ultrawealthy Is Easily Multiplied – The New York Times” or Businessweek’s “When an Eight-Figure IPO Windfall Can Mean a Zero-Digit Tax Bill.” This article is intended to provide an overview of QSBS, its usage and some general planning observations based on our experience in this area. What is QSBS? QSBS, or Section 1202 stock, generally: Is issued by a C corporation after 1993. Is acquired by a non-corporate taxpayer at original issuance. Is held for at least five years. Meets certain requirements consistent with the C corporation being a small business, including: The business’s gross assets cannot exceed $50 million at any time before the issuance. At least 80% of the assets of the business must be used in a qualified, active business (non-qualified businesses generally include service-related businesses, including services in the fields of health, engineering, financial services, law, consulting, performing arts and others). Why QSBS? The primary benefit of owning QSBS is that upon the sale of the stock, a shareholder can exclude up to $10 million of gain (or, if greater, 10 times the shareholder’s basis in the stock). If a taxpayer would otherwise be taxed at a 23.8% rate on that gain, the tax savings from owning QSBS would be $2.38 million. There are further tax planning opportunities with respect to gifting (to be able to utilize the exemption several times among family and friends) and rolling over stock to another qualifying C corporation. Planning and Pitfalls: Some Highlights Below is a short list of planning observations based on our client representation in this area: Election: The QSBS tax exclusion must be elected; it does not automatically apply. Exchanges for stock: Original issuances by the C corporation in exchange for stock do not qualify for QSBS treatment. Redemptions: Original issuances by the C corporation also do not qualify for QSBS treatment if the C corporation has made significant redemptions within a certain two-year testing period or if the shareholder at issue has had the C corporation’s stock redeemed within a certain four-year testing period. The tests related to redemptions can be complex due to related party rules, de minimis rules and certain other exceptions. Working capital exception: There is an exception to the 80% test described above for working capital. In the aftermath of the failure of Silicon Valley Bank and other bank failures, in addition to seeking to diversify banks in which companies have cash deposits, some companies have reimagined their business models and questioned whether they should pursue alternatives to cash deposits. Owning mutual funds or minority stakes in portfolio companies would generally not qualify for the working capital exception and could result in jeopardizing QSBS status. The Road Ahead While QSBS has been part of the Internal Revenue Code since 1993 and has been used in the venture capital community for years (particularly after a 2010 change in law resulted in an exclusion of 100% rather than 75% of the applicable gain), its utilization has become more widespread since a 2018 income tax rate reduction for C corporations (21% rather than 35%) made QSBS even more attractive. As a result, we are now seeing an increase in case law and guidance as audits and ruling requests proceed. In recent months, we have seen case law emerge on a conversion from a limited liability corporation to a C corporation and guidance from the IRS regarding what constitutes a qualified business for QSBS purposes. Stradley Ronon is continuing to monitor developments in this important space for startups and their investors.